Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Young v. Morgan County

August 3, 2006

THOMAS H. YOUNG, II, PLAINTIFF
v.
MORGAN COUNTY, TN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: James H. Jarvis United States District Judge

ORDER

A review of the record reflects that this court entered a scheduling order [Doc. 12] on April 3, 2006. Among other things, that scheduling order required the parties to meet within thirty (30) days from the entry of that order and to "submit to the court a written report outlining their views and proposals concerning the matters set out in Rule 26(f)(1-4) ..." within ten (10) days of that meeting [id., p.1]. However, almost four months later, the parties have not yet done so.

Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file that written report within ten (10) days from the date of this order; otherwise, this case will be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) and 41(b).

Additionally, the parties are ORDERED to comply with all other deadlines established by that scheduling order under penalty of an appropriate sanction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).

20060803

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.