Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Murray v. City of Harriman

November 9, 2006

LORETTA MURRAY, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF HARRIMAN, ET AL, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas W. Phillips United States District Judge

(Phillips/Guyton)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon defendants' motion to strike [Doc. 59]. Plaintiffs have filed a reply to the defendants' reply [Doc. 54]. Defendants correctly cite and argue E.D. TN. L.R 7.1(a), which essentially sets forth the briefing schedule and states that a plaintiff is not entitled to file another reply without first obtaining permission from the Court.

In light of the above, defendants' motion to strike [Doc. 59] is GRANTED. At this time, however, costs are not to be taxed to plaintiffs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20061109

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.