Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Long v. Monaco Coach Corp.

December 14, 2006

RANDOLPH AND GLORIA LONG, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MONACO COACH CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

(PHILLIPS/SHIRLEY)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), Rule 73(b) if the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in reference to an Order [Doc. 118] of the Honorable Thomas W. Phillips, United States District Judge, referring Daubert motions [Docs. 113, 115] to the undersigned. This Court held a telephone conference regarding Defendant's Motions in Limine as to Plaintiffs' Expert Witnesses [Docs. 113, 115] on December 12, 2006. Participating on behalf of Plaintiffs was attorney Ryan Lee. Participating on behalf of Defendant was attorney Rodney Fields.

Plaintiffs' attorney, Mr. Lee, failed to file a response to Defendant's Motions [Docs. 113, 115], although the deadline for such responses had passed. Mr. Lee informed the Court that he was mistaken about when Plaintiffs' response was due. Mr. Lee requested a Daubert hearing. Accordingly, the Court gave Plaintiffs leave to file a response to Defendant's Motions [Docs. 113, 115] up to December 22, 2006. The Daubert Hearing was then scheduled for January 10, 2007, at 9:30 a.m.

In light of the circumstances presented during the telephone conference and for good cause shown, the previous trial date of January 24, 2007, by necessity, had to be continued to a later date. A new trial date of March 5, 2007 was set on the agreement of the parties and the Court. Therefore, the Scheduling Order [Doc. 12] previously entered required amendment. All deadlines in the Scheduling Order [Doc. 12] shall be adjusted in accordance with the new trial date with certain exceptions, which are AMENDED as follows:

1. Dispositive Motions

All dispositive motions and their responses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 and all motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 shall remain as scheduled under the Scheduling Order [Doc. 12] and adjusted to the new trial date.

2. All Discovery

All discovery, including the taking of depositions "for evidence," shall be completed on or before January 1, 2007, unless a further extension is granted by the undersigned later this week.

3. Motions in Limine

All motions in limine shall remain as scheduled under the Scheduling Order [Doc. 12] and adjusted to the new trial date.

4. Daubert Hearing

The Daubert Hearing has been set for January 10, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., before the undersigned. Plaintiffs' responses to Defendant's Motions in Limine as to Plaintiffs' Expert Witnesses [Docs. 113, 115] is due on or before ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.