Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores East

January 26, 2007

IDA MAE ROGERS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Chief Judge Curtis L. Collier

ORDER

Plaintiff Ida Mae Rogers ("Plaintiff") filed a motion to amend her complaint to add a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et. seq., to strike all other causes of action, and to include a jury demand (Court File No. 25). Magistrate Judge William Carter granted Plaintiff's motion to amend but reserved ruling on Plaintiff's jury demand. In accordance with Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Magistrate Judge filed a report and recommendation recommending the motion to amend to include a jury demand be granted (Court File No. 33). Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), and hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint to include a jury demand (Court File No. 25).

SO ORDERED.

CURTIS L. COLLIER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20070126

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.