Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States v. Corona
April 27, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
VICENTE CORONA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: H. Bruce Guyton United States Magistrate Judge
All pretrial motions in this case have been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) for disposition or report and recommendation regarding disposition by the District Court as may be appropriate. The defendant Vicente Corona ("Corona") has filed a Motion For Reconsideration [Doc. 266], asking the Court to reconsider its Order [Doc. 262] quashing the defendant Corona's Rule 17(c) subpoenas to the Knox and Blount County Detention Centers for recordings of telephone conversations.
In support of the Motion, the movant filed under seal, and the Court has reviewed, a Statement In Support Of Relevance [Doc. 278]. The government has filed a response [Doc. 282], to which the movant has filed a reply [Doc. 283].
The Court finds, based upon its review of the motion, the document filed under seal, and the government's response, that the Motion For Reconsideration [Doc. 266] is not well-taken, and therefore, it is DENIED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...