Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Johnson

July 27, 2007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MAURICE ALEXANDER JOHNSON



The opinion of the court was delivered by: R. Allan Edgar United States District Judge

Judge Edgar / Carter

ORDER

Defendant Johnson moves to suppress evidence. The motion [Doc. No. 23] was referred to Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Magistrate Judge Carter held an evidentiary hearing and has submitted his report and recommendation. [Doc. No. 36]. It is recommended that the defendant's motion to suppress be denied. Defendant objects to the report and recommendation.

After reviewing the record de novo and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the defendant's objections [Doc. No. 37] are not well taken and the objections are DENIED. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For the reasons expressed in the report and recommendation, and also for the reasons expressed by the government in its response in opposition [Doc. No. 27], the defendant's motion to suppress evidence [Doc. No. 23] is DENIED. A new case management order will be entered separately to reschedule this case for trial.

SO ORDERED.

ENTER this the 27th day of July, 2007.

20070727

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.