The opinion of the court was delivered by: C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge
Gary Wayne Sutton ("Petitioner") has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By Order dated December 26, 2007, the Court granted Petitioner's request to subpoena records from the Tennessee Bureau of Investigations ("TBI") and the Office of General Counsel for the Department of Health concerning Dr. Harlan and the State's information involving his job-related and professional misconduct for an in camera inspection. These items consisted of a file copy of TBI Case Number 5A-760-NA regarding the investigation of the death of "Baby Murphy" and documents from the files of the Tennessee Department of Health's Office of General Counsel referencing Dr. Charles Harlan.
Pursuant to the Court's order of December 26, 2007 (Court File No. 41), the undersigned conducted an in camera inspectionof the TBI records and the records from the Office of General Counsel for the State of Tennessee Department of Health. Having completed the in camera review, the undersigned concludes that the below-referenced documents pertaining to Dr. Harlan are relevant and discoverable. At the evidentiary hearing in this matter the District Judge may conclude that the probative value of the documents or information contained therein is outweighed by other considerations. However, the documents are relevant to Petitioner's claims for purposes of discovery, and the parties have not asserted these documents are protected or privileged.
The State has provided no privilege log for these documents. Although it is the State's burden to prove these relevant documents are privileged, the State has failed to prove, or even specifically allege, any privilege involving these documents. Nevertheless, the undersigned has examined these documents, and they do not appear to be protected by any privilege. Although the Court does not find the relevant documents to be privileged, it is ORDERED that these documents are not to be used for any purpose other than for this litigation. Dissemination to persons who are not directly involved with counsel in this case is inappropriate. That being said, the Court now turns to the filed documents to identify the specific ones to be produced to Petitioner's counsel.
The TBI records submitted to the Court include the records pertaining to the investigation of "Baby Murphy" but do not include records from the death of Yvette Blackmum, as the TBI asserts it did not investigate the death of Ms. Blackmum. The records reflect that there was some type of investigation of Dr. Harlan. The Court observes, however, that even though there is a letter (CID-73) encouraging the TBI to follow-up on a complaint, there are no documents reflecting that such a follow-up occurred. The Court concludes the following records pertaining to Dr. Harlan are relevant to Petitioner's claims in this litigation and, thus are discoverable:
1. TBI Report from SA Roy L. Copeland to TBI File 5A-760-NA (CID-22-CID-23);
2. TBI Report from SA Rol L. Copeland to TBI File 5A-760-NA (CID-24-CID-26);
3. TBI Report from SA Roy L. Copeland to TBI File 5A-760-NA (CID-27-CID-29);
4. TBI Report from SA Roy L. Copeland to TBI File 5A-760-NA (CID-34); and
5. Letter dated July 7, 1995, from District Attorney General Tom P. Thompson, Jr. to Mr. Roy Copeland (CID-73-CID-4).
The records from the Office of General Counsel for the Department of Health include records pertaining to an investigation of Dr. Harlan. The Court concludes the following records pertaining to Dr. Harlan are relevant to ...