United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
September 30, 2014
AMY FLINN, et al.
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 57), Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 58), Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (Docket No. 59), and a Response to the Objections filed by the Defendants (Docket No. 60).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, the Response, Plaintiff's Motion and the file.
The Court agrees with the analysis in the Report and Recommendation as it relates to the Federal Wiretapping Act claims of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; provided, however, the Court modifies the recommended disposition to allow Plaintiff to amend her Amended Complaint as set forth in Docket Nos. 59 and 59-1. The Court should freely give leave to amend when justice so requires. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15.
Plaintiff's Proposed Second Amended Complaint sets forth specific examples of e-mails allegedly being blocked, intercepted and held" while the e-mail was "being transmitted to their [sic] intended recipients, and prior to the email being acquired by the electronic storage device." Docket No. 59-1, ¶ 80. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (Docket No. 59) is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Second Amended Complaint attached thereto (Docket No. 59-1).
In light of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 44) is DENIED as moot.
This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management and, specifically, to supervise discovery related to the Federal Wiretapping Act claims of the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.