Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Ivy

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Jackson

November 10, 2014

STATE OF TENNESSEE
v.
THOMAS IVY

Assigned on Briefs September 3, 2014

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 13-253 Donald H. Allen, Judge

Gregory D. Gookin, Assistant Public Defender, for the appellant, Thomas Ivy.

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; Rachel E. Willis, Senior Counsel: James G. Woodall, District Attorney General; and Shaun Brown, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Alan E. Glenn, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Robert W. Wedemeyer and Robert L. Holloway, Jr., JJ., joined.

OPINION

ALAN E. GLENN, JUDGE

FACTS

On April 1, 2013, the defendant and a co-defendant, Nicholas Sinclair, were indicted for possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Following Sinclair's guilty plea to the possession of marijuana charge, the trial court entered an order of nolle prosequi as to that count, and the defendant proceeded to trial on the two remaining counts. He was convicted of the drug paraphernalia charge, but the jury could not reach a verdict on the possession of cocaine charge, and the trial court declared a mistrial. The cocaine charge was subsequently dismissed.

At trial, Investigator Tikal Greer of the Jackson Police Department Metro Narcotics Unit testified that he and other officers executed a search warrant at 160 Leland Lane on October 5, 2012. The tactical unit forced entry into the residence after no one responded to their "knock and announce" at the door. Officers found the defendant in the bathroom that was connected to the south bedroom and the co-defendant and two other men in the north end of the home. After the four men were searched and secured outside, the canine unit was sent in to make a sweep of the residence. The canine alerted on certain areas of the home, and a search was then conducted. Inside the bedroom where the defendant was located, officers recovered a digital scale containing marijuana residue on top of a television and a gold grinder containing approximately one gram of marijuana on the floor beside the television. Clothes, mail, and other property belonging to the defendant were also found in the same bedroom. Investigator Greer acknowledged that no contraband was found on the defendant's person.

Officers also searched a tan-colored Cadillac parked in the driveway of the residence, after the canine alerted to the vehicle. Investigator Greer found a white powdery substance inside a small pocket behind the driver's seat and a plastic baggie containing a white powdery substance on the floor. He was unable to determine the owner of the car because when he ran the tags and VIN number, it came back as unregistered. The keys to the vehicle were found in the bedroom where the defendant had been located. The defendant said the vehicle belonged to his sister. The vehicle was seized and, at a subsequent seizure hearing, the defendant paid $1500 to get the vehicle back.

Special Agent Forensic Scientist Brock Sain of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation ("TBI") testified that he analyzed the two substances submitted to him in the case. The white powdery substance in the plastic baggie tested positive for cocaine and weighed .05 grams, but the second substance did not contain cocaine.

Testifying for the defendant, Nickey Manning, the co-defendant's sister and the defendant's girlfriend, said that she lived at the residence where the search warrant was executed but denied that the defendant lived there, saying he "was in and out" of the house while she and her husband were "on a break." She said that in 2012 her seventeen-year-old son was charged with possession of marijuana in juvenile court. A couple of months after that but before the search warrant was executed at her home, she took a scale and a grinder away from her son and placed them on the dresser beside her television. Asked why she did not throw the items away, Manning replied, "I don't know. . . . I just left it there."

On cross-examination, Manning denied that the defendant kept his clothes in her bedroom, saying that the men's clothing in her closet belonged to her son. She acknowledged that the defendant stayed at her home the night before the search warrant was ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.