Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Stocker v. Colvin

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee, Chattanooga

January 23, 2015

DAVID ANTHONY STOCKER, Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

JUDGMENT ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 31, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a report and recommendation (“R&R”) in this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) (Court File No. 15). Neither party has objected to the R&R within the given fourteen days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the R&R. The Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion for Summary Judgment (Court File No. 11) is GRANTED in part to the extent that it seeks remand and DENIED in part, to the extent it seeks reversal for an award of benefits;

(2) The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Court File No. 13) is DENIED;

(3) The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED AND REMANDED under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for action consistent with the Report and Recommendation (Court File No. 15) (1) to further evaluate the opinion of the treating physician and further evaluate the opinion of the state agency physicians in light of the record showing they considered the detailed notes of the treating physician before opining Plaintiff was capable of only light work and REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative consideration of new and material evidence under Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to reassess the case in light of all of the evidence including the evidence presented by Plaintiff after the administrative hearing and to consider any other evidence presented bearing on the question of Plaintiff’s RFC.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.