Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Houston

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Chattanooga

March 11, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
CELVIN HOUSTON, Defendant.

ORDER

HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge.

On February 18, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge William B. Carter filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 90) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Magistrate Judge Carter recommended that Defendant's Motion to Suppress his Statement (Docs. 41, and 64) be denied as moot, Defendant's Motion to Suppress the Contents of his Cell Phone (Docs. 42 and 65) be denied, and Defendant's Motion to Suppress the Recordings of his Phone Calls (Docs. 46 and 66) be granted. (Doc. 90 at 20).

Neither the Government nor the Defendant have filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.[1] Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the record in this matter, and it agrees with the Magistrate Judge's well-reasoned conclusions.

Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's findings of fact and conclusions of law, and Defendant's Motion to Suppress his Statement (Docs. 41, and 64) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT, Defendant's Motion to Suppress the Contents of his Cell Phone (Docs. 42 and 65) is hereby DENIED, and Defendant's Motion to Suppress the Recordings of his Phone Calls (Docs. 46 and 66) is hereby GRANTED. (Doc. 90 at 20).

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.