Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ross v. Kopocs

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Chattanooga Division

April 1, 2015

SETH PATRICK ROSS, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
FRANK KOPOCS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

SUSAN K. LEE, Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is "Plaintiffs' Notice of Need for a Daubert Hearing" regarding the admissibility of the expert testimony of one of Defendants' experts, Gary L. Holbrook, which was docketed as a motion [Doc. 105].

The admissibility of any expert's testimony will be determined under Fed.R.Evid. 702 and the standards established by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny. It appears this case involves a challenge to the admissibility of some or all of the testimony of at least one expert. Accordingly, all parties SHALL file any motion challenging the admissibility of expert testimony, with supporting memorandum and the expert report at issue, no later than April 14, 2015. To the extent Plaintiffs disclose any rebuttal experts as provided in the Court's March 26, 2015 Order [Doc. 102], any motion challenging the admissibility of said rebuttal expert testimony SHALL be due no later than 21 days from the disclosure. The Court will set a hearing on any such motions, if deemed necessary, in due course.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to term the notice/motion [Doc. 105].

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.