Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lewis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Knoxville

April 7, 2015

STEPHEN W. LEWIS
v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE

Assigned on Briefs December 9, 2014

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. 41206, 38307, 34866, 32798 Robert H. Montgomery, Jr., Judge

Stephen W. Lewis, Wartburg, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Benjamin A. Ball, Assistant Attorney General; and Barry Staubus, District Attorney General, for the appellee, the State of Tennessee.

Thomas T. Woodall, P. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Alan E. Glenn and Timothy L. Easter, JJ., joined.

OPINION

THOMAS T. WOODALL, PRESIDING JUDGE

According to the order of the panel of this court which granted the writ of certiorari, Petitioner was convicted of DUI, sixth offense, in June 1994, and was fined $1, 000.00; in July 1998, he was convicted of DUI, eighth offense, and fined $4, 000.00; also in 1998, he was convicted of unlawfully driving while being an habitual motor vehicle offender with costs and fees imposed in the amount of $304.00.

According to Petitioner's motion, he has attempted to have his driver's license reinstated, but the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security informed him that all the fines and costs, imposed more than ten years prior to the filing of his motion, had to be either paid in full or "waived as a result of indigence" by the trial court before his driver's license could be reinstated.

In his motion, Petitioner argued that he was entitled to relief because collection of the fines and costs by the State was barred by the ten-year statute of limitations contained in T.C.A. § 28-3-110(a)(2). Petitioner also alleged that the trial court had authority to "release [Petitioner] . . . from the whole or any part of fines or forfeitures accruing to the county or state." T.C.A. § 40-24-102. As noted by the panel of this court in its order granting the writ of certiorari,

The trial court retains jurisdiction, even after final judgment, to modify the payment schedule or to reduce or remit entirely the amount of fines for which the defendant may be obligated. State v. Blevins, 968 S.W.2d 888, 895, n. 1 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-24-102.

In its order summarily dismissing the motion, the trial court ruled that the ten-year statute of limitations was not applicable because there was no civil action pending to collect the fines and costs. Furthermore, the trial court ruled that it was without jurisdiction to review the "administrative action" of the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security which requires Petitioner to pay all fines and costs prior to reinstatement of his driver's license.

The Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security imposed the requirement of payment of all fines and costs by Petitioner prior to reinstatement of his driver's license pursuant to authority granted by the General Assembly in T.C.A. § 55-50-303(b)(1) and (2). That statutory provision provides as follows:

(b)(1) In addition to all other requirements of law, prior to reinstating the driving privileges and/or reissuing a driver license to any person who has been convicted of the offense of driving while under the influence, the department shall require certification that all fines and costs have been paid to the court of jurisdiction. The certification shall be made upon a form supplied by the department, and shall indicate the fines and costs levied by the court, that all fines and costs have been paid to the court, or that the fines and/or costs were waived as a result of the person being found to be indigent by the court, if the court is located within this state. The form shall be completed and certified by the clerk of the court of jurisdiction; provided, however, that it is the sole responsibility of the individual seeking reinstatement or reissuance to obtain the certification and present it to the department.
(2) Persons convicted of any other offense requiring mandatory revocation of driving privileges shall be required to present the same certification in subdivision (b)(1) prior to the reinstatement of driving ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.