Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2015
Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 97-09258, 97-09259 & 97-09260 Chris Craft, Judge
Dericko Jackson, Whiteville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Tracy L. Alcock, Assistant Attorney General; Amy P. Weirich, District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Robert W. Wedemeyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Robert H. Montgomery, Jr., and Timothy L. Easter, JJ., joined.
ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, JUDGE
This case arises from the Petitioner's 1997 arrest in three separate cases. In case number 97-09258 he was charged with first degree felony murder in the perpetration of a robbery, in case number 97-09259 he was charged with especially aggravated robbery, and in case number 97-09260 he was charged with aggravated assault. On September 1, 1998, the Petitioner pleaded guilty to each of the charged offenses pursuant to a plea agreement covering all three cases. The trial court entered the agreed sentences of: life imprisonment for the felony murder conviction; fifteen years for the especially aggravated robbery conviction; and three years for the aggravated assault conviction. The sentences for the felony murder and especially aggravated robbery convictions were to run consecutively, with the sentence for aggravated assault to run concurrently with the Petitioner's felony murder sentence. Each of the judgments of conviction reflect that the Petitioner be given 480 days of pretrial jail credit, for the time he served between his arrest on May 9, 1997, to the day before his guilty plea, August 31, 1998.
In June 2012, the Petitioner filed a petition for habeas corpus relief challenging the pretrial jail credit being applied to his conviction for especially aggravated robbery. The habeas corpus court dismissed the petition, and this Court affirmed. Dericko Jackson v. Michael Donahue, Warden, No. W2013-01718-CCA-R3-HC, 2014 WL 2547764, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, May 30, 2014), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Oct. 15, 2014).
On May 27, 2014, the Petitioner filed a "Motion To Correct An Illegal Sentence." In the motion he again contended that the trial court improperly applied his jail credits to both his sentences. The trial court summarily denied the Petitioner's motion. The trial court found:
FROM ALL OF WHICH THE COURT FINDS that the [Petitioner] complains of a negotiated sentence he is serving because of his guilty plea on September 1, 1998 to Murder in Perpetration of a Felony (life), Especially Aggravated Robbery (15 years) and Aggravated Assault (3 years). By agreement, the life sentence and the 15 year sentence were to be served consecutively, but concurrently with the 3 year sentence. The [Petitioner] complains that his sentence is illegal because the judgments entered for the life sentence and the 15 year sentence each show 480 days jail credit, and the credit should only have been awarded to one of the sentences because they were to be served consecutively.
This court finds that the sentences are not illegal, and that the motion is without any legal merit. The judgments are proper. Just because the judgments show 480 days jail credit does not mean that the Department of Correction must award 480 days to each sentence. As the sentences are to be served consecutively, the Department need only apply the 480 days of jail credits to one sentence.
It is from this judgment that the ...