United States District Court, Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division
KEVIN H. SHARP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 30), recommending that Defendant’s “Second Motion to Dismiss” (Docket No. 28), be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The R & R does not, however, recommend an award of attorney fees and expenses. Plaintiff failed to file a Response to the Second Motion to Dismiss, and no objections were made to the R & R.
Where no objections are made to the R & R, “[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Fed R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 30) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) Defendant’s Second Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 28) is GRANTED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the ...