Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Wooten

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Greeneville

November 9, 2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RANDY LEE WOOTEN

          Donald W. Taylor Assistant US. Attorney

          Randy Lee Wooten Defendant

          Robert C. Welch U.S. Probation Officer

          Nikki C. Pierce Attorney for Defendant

          AGREED ORDER OF REVOCATION

          Honorable R. Leon Jordan United States District Judge.

         A Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release has been filed against the defendant. Randy Lee Wooten, and the defendant admits that he has violated the conditions of his supervised release. An agreement has been reached between the parties, recommending that Mr. Wooten's supervised release should be revoked and that he should receive a sentence of time served to be followed by three (3) years of supervised release. All previously imposed general, standard and special conditions shall continue to apply with the addition of the following special conditions:

1. The defendant shall submit his or her person, property, house, vehicle, papers, [computers (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(1)), other electronic communications or data storage devices or media, ] or office, to a search conducted by a United Slates probation officer or designee. Failure to submit to a search may be grounds for revocation of release. The defendant shall warn any other occupants that the premises may be subject to searches pursuant to this condition. An officer may conduct a search pursuant to this condition only when reasonable suspicion exists that the defendant has violated a condition of his supervision and that the areas to be searched contain evidence of this violation. Any search must be conducted at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner.
2. You shall not take any opiate-based medication, or any other controlled substance, without notifying the physician that you have a substance abuse problem and without obtaining permission from your probation officer.

         Mr. Wooten agrees to waive his right to a hearing pursuant to Rule 32 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, waive his right to allocute at a revocation hearing, and asks that the agreement of the defendant and the government pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure be found to be a proper sentence. In doing so, the defendant acknowledges that he is giving up the following rights:

(1) The right to the assistance of counsel for his defense.
(2) The right to see and hear all the witnesses and have them cross-examined in his defense.
(3) The right on his own part not to testify unless he chose to do so in his defense, and
(4) The right to the issuance of subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses to testify on his behalf.

         Mr. Woolen stipulates to the following violations that can be proven by the government ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.